The LMT passport timeline is the sequence that leads to the fixed passport duty on 18 February 2027 and continues through the life of batteries placed on the market from that date. The fixed date is set in Article 77 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 for each LMT battery, each industrial battery above 2 kWh and each electric vehicle battery placed on the market or put into service from that date. The timeline around the fixed date includes labelling, QR code, carbon footprint and delegated act steps, each with its own date and status, and the fixed passport date should not be treated as the date for every step.
Timeline reading for LMT batteries needs two disciplines. First, separate fixed dates in the Regulation from expected dates that depend on delegated or implementing acts. Second, separate the date a battery is placed on the market from the date a battery is manufactured, sold or first used. The passport duty attaches to placing on the market or putting into service from 18 February 2027, so a battery placed on the market before that date does not acquire a passport duty by the arrival of the date alone, while a battery placed on the market from that date must have a passport at that point.
What is fixed on 18 February 2027 for LMT batteries?
On 18 February 2027, each LMT battery placed on the market or put into service must have a battery passport under Article 77. The same date brings the QR code marking duty for batteries within scope under Article 13, and the removability and replaceability duties for portable and LMT batteries under Article 11. Those duties share a date but remain separate duties, with separate evidence and separate checks. A battery that meets the QR duty but lacks a passport, or that has a passport but lacks the QR carrier, fails the combined requirement for the date.
A fixed date checklist for LMT batteries should list the passport, the QR carrier, the label set applicable on the date, and the removability evidence as separate lines, each with a status and an evidence reference. A single line stating that a battery is ready for 2027, without separating the duties, hides a gap in any one duty. The checklist should be dated as checked on 28 October 2026 for the framework, with a review trigger for each delegated or implementing act that remains open.
What applies before 18 February 2027?
Before 18 February 2027, the Regulation already applies in part, with duties on labelling, separate collection, safety documentation, performance and durability documentation and conformity assessment applying on their own timetables from 2024 onwards. The passport duty itself does not apply before the fixed date, but preparation before the date is the period in which classification, data collection, identifier systems, access tiers and hosting arrangements are built and tested. A preparation programme that starts in early 2027, with no prior data or identifier work, compresses testing into the period when the duty is already live.
| Period | Focus | Record output |
|---|---|---|
| Before fixed date, preparation | Classification, data, identifiers, access, hosting | Tested record system and sample passports |
| On fixed date | Placing on the market with passport | Passport and carrier for each battery |
| After fixed date | Updates, repair, second life, collection | Current passport through life stages |
Worked check: a manufacturer plans to place LMT packs on the market in March 2027. The preparation file shows classification notes from 2026, supplier data templates, identifier allocation, carrier printing tests and access tier tests. The March placing can proceed on the tested system. A second manufacturer plans the same placing with no preparation file and intends to create passports at the point of sale. The second plan carries a high risk of duplicate identifiers, missing supplier data and unresolved access, because the system has not been tested before the duty applies.
How do delegated acts affect the LMT timeline?
Delegated acts affect the LMT timeline by setting methods, thresholds and detailed rules for duties such as carbon footprint declaration, performance classes and passport access and updating. Article 77 requires delegated and implementing acts on passport details, including access rights and the rules for introducing, modifying and updating information. Until those acts are adopted, the Regulation text and Commission guidance provide the framework, but the detailed form of some passport fields remains open. A timeline that treats every passport detail as settled before the acts are adopted overstates certainty.
Delegated act tracking should be a dated log, with each act named, its subject, its status as checked on 28 October 2026, and the passport field or duty it affects. A log that states only that delegated acts are pending, without naming the acts or the fields affected, does not support planning. A log that names the act, the field and the review date allows a manufacturer to plan interim work on settled fields and to hold open work on fields that the act will define. Interim work should be marked interim, with the act named as the review trigger.
What is the readiness sequence for an LMT operator?
The readiness sequence for an LMT operator runs from classification, through data collection, identifier and carrier design, access tier design, hosting and registry interaction, testing, and placing on the market. Classification comes first, because data templates, carbon footprint duties and performance duties all follow the category. Data collection follows, because supplier and test data take the longest to obtain and verify. Identifier, carrier and access design follow, because they depend on the data structure. Testing follows design, using sample batteries and independent scans. Placing on the market follows successful testing, not the other way round.
Readiness should be evidenced at each step, with a dated sign off that states what was tested and what remains open. A readiness claim based on a single overall statement, without step evidence, cannot be audited. A readiness file that shows step evidence, open items and review dates can be audited, and it allows a delay in one step, such as a delegated act, to be managed without claiming that the whole programme is complete. The sequence is a control, not a marketing timetable.
How does the timeline differ by operator role?
The timeline differs by operator role because each role enters the chain at a different point. Manufacturers and importers must be ready at the placing on the market date, because the passport must exist at that point. Distributors must be ready to check carriers and labels at the point of making batteries available, which follows placing on the market by a short interval. Repairers, recyclers and second life operators must be ready to read and update records through the life of the battery, which extends years beyond the fixed date. A single timeline with a single readiness date for every role misstates the chain.
Role timelines should be drawn as separate lines on the same chart, with the placing date as the anchor for manufacturers and importers, the availability date as the anchor for distributors, and the life stage dates as anchors for repairers and recyclers. Each line should carry its own readiness evidence and its own review trigger. A distributor readiness check that copies a manufacturer readiness statement, without checking carrier resolution at the distributor point, misses the distributor duty. Role specific checks are the point of the separate lines.
What misconceptions distort the LMT timeline?
Common misconceptions include treating the passport date as a grace period end for all battery duties, treating a battery manufactured before the date as automatically exempt without checking the placing date, treating portable batteries as passport batteries because they carry a QR code, and treating an expected delegated act date as a fixed duty date. Each misconception produces a planning error: late preparation, incorrect exemption, overbuilt portable records, or a compliance claim based on an act that has not been adopted. The correction in each case is to return to the Regulation text and the placing date, and to label expected dates as expected.
As checked on 28 October 2026, the only fixed passport date in this guide is 18 February 2027 for the three categories named in Article 77. All other dates in the surrounding timetable should be checked against the current act status before they are used for planning. This guide gives general educational information only and is not individual legal advice. A reader with a specific battery or market decision should check the current Regulation text and any applicable delegated act, as checked on 28 October 2026, before acting.
This guide gives general educational information only and is not individual legal advice. A reader with a specific battery or market decision should check the current Regulation text and any applicable delegated act, as checked on 28 October 2026, before acting. The LMT timeline is anchored to placing on the market, and preparation evidence should show the sequence that leads to that anchor.
Sources & further reading
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries, consolidated text ↗
- Batteries and waste batteries, Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, EUR-Lex summary ↗
- Digital product passport FAQs, European Commission single market pages ↗
Source links point to primary materials and further reading, including commercial implementation resources where cited. This introductory guide does not replace the legislation.